Translate

Friday, March 28, 2014

THE OBAMA REPORT 28,560
















THE  OBAMA  REPORT


http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/07/08/obamas-key-nuclear-deal-with-russia/
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/03/blurred-lines-six-countries-that-totally-ignored-obamas-demands/


*  Special thanks to:  "Fox News", "New York Daily News".
"PRI - Public Radio International"  and  "The Associated Press". 


BLOG  POST
by Felicity Blaze Noodleman
Los Angeles, CA
3.24.14


We’re checking in President Obama again this week!  The President continues to slide in the polls with his worse performance to date!  We have assembled four articles for this task – (1)  “Fox News Poll:  Obama Approval Ratings Keeps Sliding”, (2)  “As Obama’s Approval Rating Slips, Democrats Are Avoiding Him” and (3)  “President Obama Starts This Week’s Trip To Europe In A Country In A Country Where His Popularity is Huge”.

In all fairness to the President, his poll ratings are not all his fault but are an indicator of a larger problem with his party’s ideologies as a whole.  Democrats want to distance themselves from the President but this is ironic since Democrats are down in the polls as well.  The White House is only a symbol for the disconnect the President and his party have created in Washington DC.

So what could be the reason behind this unprecedented failure with Democrats?  Washington’s “Business as Usual” has been disrupted by the Federal Deficit and this is where we turn for our fourth article this week; “Federal Budget Deficit To Drop To 514 Billion”.  This is only a projection; it has not happened yet!  Let’s face it, the party’s over and now and it’s time to pay the check.  Democrats have not exactly taken the lead here are seen as dragging their feet while the Republicans have been in the forefront with real options for reducing the deficit while holding down new taxes.    


We have also collected a few political cartoons to illustrate our article this week.  We hope you will be entertained while reviewing the news articles we have put together.  Thanks for being with the “Noodleman Group”!


http://netrightdaily.com/2012/09/democrat-party-platform/



Fox News Poll: Obama Approval Ratings Keep Sliding

Reuters/Landov

Thursday, 06 Mar 2014 06:34 AM
By Elliot Jager

Sixty percent of Americans say the United States is worse off today than it was when Barack Obama became president, according to the latest Fox News poll. 

Only 34 percent think the country is better off. The president is also slipping among Democrats. In 2012, 81 percent felt the country was better off; that figure is now 57 percent.

The new poll brought more bad news for Obama. On practically every key issue from the economy and job creation to healthcare and foreign policy, a majority of Americans disapprove of the president's performance.
Statistically, the president has hit a record low in popular opinion this week. The Fox poll shows 54 percent of Americans disapprove of how he has done his job. Less than four in 10 voters — 38 percent — feel positive about his performance. That's down from November 2013, when 40 percent approved.

Most Democrats — 71 percent — continue to support the president. Sixty percent or better of Democrats think the president has basically succeeded in dealing with the country's main challenges, except for governmental transparency, where he gets a 47 percent approval rating.

Independents and Republicans frown on his overall performance, with 28 percent of independents, and 5 percent of Republicans approving of Obama.

On creating jobs, 59 percent of the country believes the White House has basically failed. Regarding his overall handling of the economy, 58 percent give him the thumbs down, with 36 percent approving.

The president said he wanted his administration to be transparent but the poll shows 59 percent think Obama has generally failed on this score.

The administration has invested its political capital in the Affordable Care Act. Overall, though, 59 percent disapprove of the president's handling of healthcare, while 36 percent approve. Asked directly if Obama had mostly succeeded or mostly failed on improving the country's healthcare system, 57 percent say he mostly failed; 36 percent think he has mostly made things better.

The poll shows that 56 percent of Americans disapprove of how the president manages foreign policy, while 33 percent approve. A majority, 59 percent, say he has mostly failed to improve America's image around the globe. That is a new low for the administration which garnered a 39 percent approval and 52 percent disapproval on foreign policy in December.

The president's positives are highest on homeland security. On that subject, 41 percent think his administration has as a rule succeeded. That is still worse than the 52 percent who approved in 2012. Some 48 percent today feel the White House has by and large failed to secure the homeland.

There is also a glimmer of good news for the president on the economy where just 51 percent of Americans think the economy is getting worse: that's down from 55 percent who felt negatively in February 2013.

The poll was conducted between March 2-4 by telephone and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/economy-healthcare-foreign-policy-Obama/2014/03/06/id/556368/


http://skydancingblog.com/2010/12/04/would-a-serious-primary-challenge-force-obama-to-move-left/



As Obama's Approval Rating Slips, Democrats Are Avoiding Him
Dems dodge Obama, whose approval rating is the worst since his election, according to a new poll.

BY DAN FRIEDMAN 
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Monday, February 24, 2014, 10:21 PM


Jacquelyn Martin/AP
Democrats are avoiding President Obama, who received a negative approval rating in a new poll taken by the Star Tribune newspaper in Minnesota.


WASHINGTON — When President Obama goes abroad, world leaders come to meet him. When Obama travels at home these days, members of his own party often avoid him.
When Obama speaks Wednesday in St. Paul, Minn., on the economy, Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) "hopes he can join the President," a spokesman for the former funnyman said. "But it's uncertain if his schedule will allow for travel since the Senate is in session."
"Maybe out of an abundance of caution Franken is hesitating to be in the state," said prominent political handicapper Stuart Rothenberg.
Minnesota is a liberal state by national standards. But a poll this month by the state's Star Tribune newspaper found Obama's approval rating there had for the first time turned negative. Half of Gopher State respondents disapproved of Obama's performance while 43% approved, his worst marks since his election.
Nationally, Democrats hold 55 Senate seats to Republicans' 45. But most contested Senate races feature Democratic incumbents running states Obama didn't carry.

JOSÉ MÉNDEZ/EPA

World leaders are happy to meet President Obama when he travels abroad. But at home, Democrats are staying away from the president as his approval rating slips. In this photo, Obama is seen with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto (center) and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper (right) on Wednesday.



That means Obama's relative unpopularity is a key factor in handicappers' belief that Republicans have better-than-even odds of winning back Senate control this year.
If the President’s a political liability in Minnesota, it's a no-brainer for Democrats to keep their distance from Obama in key battleground states such as Alaska, Arkansas, Louisiana, Montana and North Carolina, where Democrats need to hang onto seats to keep control of the Senate.
The same applies in Georgia and Kentucky, states where Democrats hope to gain seats. Obama lost all those states in 2012.
"I stand in stark contrast to the President in many of his ideas and platforms," Alison Lundergan Grimes, the Kentucky Democratic Secretary of State hoping to oust powerful Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell this year, told MSNBC on Monday in explaining that she doesn't want Obama campaigning with her.

HANNAH FOSLIEN/AP

President Obama walks with, from left, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., and Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton, upon his arrival at the Minneapolis St. Paul Airport on Monday, Aug. 15, 2011. These days, however, Democrats are avoiding Obama, who received a negative approval rating in a new poll.



The President's popularity is the most important factor in midterm congressional election, pollsters say. Voters focus on him, even though he's not on the ballot.
Democrats in states that tend to vote Republican in national races win by localizing the election and distancing themselves from the national Democratic Party. That means avoiding Obama.
Last month, Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan, who is in a fight for a second term, said she couldn't get away from Washington to join Obama when he spoke in Raleigh, N.C.
In November, Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) claimed a prior engagement in the state kept her from joining Obama at a New Orleans event.

JONATHAN ERNST/REUTERS

President Obama makes remarks before the 2014 Governors' Dinner in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington on Sunday. In a new poll taken in Minnesota, half the respondents disapproved of Obama's performance. His falling approval rating has Democrats ducking him.


Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska) has said he is "not really interested in campaigning with Obama." Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) said last year that he won't ask Obama to campaign for him because the President "just doesn't offer a lot to states like Arkansas."
In House races, too, lawmakers in the swing districts where national parties are focusing resources will generally decline a public POTUS embrace. The National Republican Congressional Committee next week plans to publicly press two dozen Democrats they hope to defeat on campaigning with Obama.
Obama gets all of this. Sources said he told Senate Democrats at a meeting last month that he would not be offended if he is not asked this year to visit states where he is unpopular.
Instead, Obama will concentrate on the big area where he can help his party: fundraising. Democrats may duck Obama on the trail, but they need the access to the big money a sitting President can raise.
"Democrats are happy to have Obama raise money for them." Rothenberg said. "They just don't want to be in photos or videos with him."
dfriedman@nydailynews.com

 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/obama-negative-approval-rating-dems-ducking-article-1.1700590


http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/barackobama/ig/Barack-Obama-Cartoons/Obama-s-Two-Modes.htm



President Obama Starts This Week's Trip To Europe In A Country Where His Popularity Is Huge
PRI's The World
Producer David Leveille
March 23, 2014 · 12:30 PM EDT

Credit: Nuclear Security Summit
The first Nuclear Security Summit was held in Washington, 2010.



Obama has a packed week ahead dealing with nuclear security, rallying European leaders to respond to Russia and even meeting with Pope Francis. And while his approval rating in the US was 48 percent in a Friday poll, he's starting his trip in a nation where that number is likely much higher: the Netherlands.
On Monday, he attends the Nuclear Security Summit in The Hague, a series of meetings that Obama launched to reduce the threat of nuclear terrorism.
"We are very much a strong ally of USA," says historian Willem Post of the Clingendael, a Dutch institute for international relations. President Obama's approval ratings may dip in the US, but not in the Netherlands, he says. The president will get a very, very warm welcome.
"These countries in Western Europe are really Obama countries," Post says. "I think that has to do with the fact that this is a US president who calls himself a global citizen [and urges] diplomacy first. That's a little bit different than in the Bush era. And here this Nuclear Security Summit in The Hague is a multi-lateral phenomenon and one of the top priorities of the president. So people see this is Obama once again stressing diplomacy and saying ‘let's do it together.’"
Post says neither the NSA surveillance revelations nor the crisis in Ukraine has soured the sympathetic Dutch view toward Obama. 
One reason for this support, suggests Post, is that many of the Dutch understand Obama's challenges. The Netherlands has a Tea Party-like movement, he says, where Geert Wilders is the right wing populace leader in the Netherlands and is in the opposition.
"He's quite a phenomenon," Post says. "So in the Netherlands, a lot of people understand what the challenge is for the President Obama in the US in this very politicized, polar climate. People understand how complicated the road is."
As a small country, the Netherlands also feels vulnerable. Obama's approach, argues Post, of admitting that the US doesn't have unlimited power and wanting to work with Europe on a unified approach to problems is a big part of Obama's appeal. 
"There's even an Obama Club in the Netherlands," he says, "the first Obama club in the world, the largest," where members get together for serious discussions of foreign policy issues, diversity, and multi-lateralism — all key points of Obama's presidency.
Monday begins the Nuclear Security Summit, where delegations from 53 countries will discuss how to secure nuclear materials and prevent their use by terrorists. Obama has called for a meeting of the G7 members during the Netherlands visit to discuss a united approach to Russia's annexation of the Crimea. He will also meet with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, before moving on to Amsterdam and a visit to NATO headquarters.
He will then head to Rome for a meeting with Pope Francis. And he'll end his trip in Saudi Arabia, where he will be discussing the Syrian crisis.
Obama will get at least a touch of tourism while in the Netherlands. He plans to visit Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum for a look at Rembrandt van Rijn's newly illuminated and exhibited masterpiece, "The Night Watch." And Willem Post hopes he will have time to drop in on the Obama club to greet his fans. 


Credit: Rijksmuseum Amsterdam via Wikimedia Commons
The Night Watch, Rembrandt (1606–1669), Rijksmuseum Amsterdam.


http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-03-23/president-obama-starts-weeks-trip-europe-country-where-his-popularity-huge



http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2008/07/cartoonists_take_their_pokes_a.html



Federal Budget Deficit To Drop To $514 Billion

© Jason Reed / Reuters/Reuters
The Congressional Budget Office’s Tuesday report found that the 2014 deficit will be the lowest since President Obama took office in 2009.


THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Tuesday, February 4, 2014, 11:55 AM
Jason Reed / Reuters/Reuters 

The 2014 deficit projection fell from $680 billion in 2013.

A new report released Tuesday says the government’s budget deficit is set to fall to $514 billion for the current year, down substantially from last year and the lowest by far since President Barack Obama took office five years ago.

The Congressional Budget Office report credits higher tax revenues from the rebounding economy and sharp curbs on agency spending as the chief reason for the deficit’s short-term decline.

But CBO sees the long-term deficit picture worsening by about $100 billion a year through the end of the decade because of slower growth in the economy over the coming decade than it had previously predicted.

Last year’s deficit registered $680 billion. Obama inherited an economy in crisis and first-ever deficits exceeding $1 trillion. The 2009 deficit, swelled by the costs of the Wall Street bailout, hit a record $1.4 trillion, while the deficits of 2010 and 2011 both registered $1.3 trillion.

The report predicted the economy will continue to rebound this year and grow at a 3.1 percent rate and by 3.4 percent next year. It foresees the jobless rate holding steady at 6.8 percent this year; the most recent nationwide unemployment rate registered 6.7 percent. It predicts the jobless rate remaining above 6 percent through the remainder of Obama’s term.

CBO sees the deficit sliding to $478 billion next year before beginning a steady rise years through 2024 that would bring deficits back above $1 trillion a year.

“CBO expects that economic growth will diminish to a pace that is well below the average seen over the past several decades,” the report said, citing an aging population and decrease in the rate of growth in the labor force.

As it has for many years, CBO predicts the stark demographics of the nation’s retirement programs, especially the growth of Medicare, would eventually spark a debt crisis.

Economists say that too-high deficits and debt are a drag on the economy and squeezing out investment and, if unchecked, could eventually precipitate a European-style fiscal crisis.

The agency also predicts that the new health care law will have a dampening effect on employment, in part because of “Obamacare’s” dampening effect on wages, but also because the law’s subsidies would give some people less incentive to work. By 2017, CBO believes there will be 2 million fewer workers.

Tuesday’s report comes as Obama and Republicans in Congress are taking a respite in the budget wars that have periodically consumed Washington since Republicans took control of the House in 2011. The declining deficit numbers mean there’s even less urgency to act now.

A December budget agreement and last month’s follow-up spending bill promise to buy peace through November’s mid-term elections. Republicans also appear to be taking a less confrontational approach to legislation needed this month to increase the government’s borrowing limit to avoid defaulting on its obligations.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/federal-budget-deficit-drop-514-billion-article-1.1601636


http://www.commonsenseevaluation.com/tag/deficit/#sthash.ulnXuqrS.dpbs




 
Tell your friends and associates about us! 
It's easy!  Just copy and paste me into your email!



* “The Noodleman Group” is pleased to announce that we are now carrying a link to the “USA Today” news site.We installed the “widget/gadget” August 20, and it will be carried as a regular feature on our site.Now you can read“Noodleman” and then check in to “USA Today” for all the up to date News, Weather, Sports and more!Just scroll all the way down to the bottom of our site and hit the “USA Today” hyperlinks.Enjoy! 










Friday, March 21, 2014

LABOR UNIONS 28,026



LABOR  UNIONS

Some of the largest and oldest Industrial American Unions


*Special thanks to "Wikipedia", "Google Images", "The New York Times",
and " http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/03/the-continuing-unpopularity-of-labor-unions"




BLOG  POST
by Felicity Blaze Noodleman
Los Angeles, CA
3.21.14


Labor Unions have a history which dates back to the 1880’s in the United States and are somewhat similar to the trade Guilds of Europe which date back to the Middle Ages.   A guild is an association of artisans or merchants who control the practice of their craft in a particular town. The earliest types of guild were formed as confraternities of workers. They were organized in a manner something between a professional association, trade union, a cartel, and a secret society. They often depended on grants of letters patent by a monarch or other authority to enforce the flow of trade to their self-employed members, and to retain ownership of tools and the supply of materials.

Unions began forming in the mid-19th century in response to the social and economic impact of the industrial revolution. National labor unions began to form in the post-Civil War Era. The Knights of Labor emerged as a major force in the late 1880s, but it collapsed because of poor organization, lack of effective leadership, disagreement over goals, and strong opposition from employers and government forces.




AFL–CIO
The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL–CIO) is a national trade union center, the largest federation of unions in the United States, made up of fifty-seven national and international unions, together representing more than 11 million workers (as of June 2008, the most recent official statistic). It was formed in 1955 when the AFL and the CIO merged after a long estrangement. From 1955 until 2005, the AFL–CIO's member unions represented nearly all unionized workers in the United States. Several large unions split away from AFL–CIO and formed the rival Change to Win Federation in 2005 but several unions have since reaffiliated. The largest union currently in the AFL–CIO is the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), with more than 1.6 million members.


Membership

The AFL–CIO is a federation of international labor unions. As a voluntary federation, the AFL–CIO has little authority over the affairs of its member unions except in extremely limited cases (such as the ability to expel a member union for corruption (Art. X, Sec. 17) and enforce resolution of disagreements over jurisdiction or organizing). As of October 2013, the AFL–CIO had 57 member unions.

Membership in the AFL–CIO is largely unrestricted. Since its inception as the American Federation of Labor, the AFL–CIO has supported an image of the federation as the "House of Labor"—an all-inclusive, national federation of "all" labor unions. Currently, the AFL–CIO's only explicit restriction on membership excludes those labor unions whose "policies and activities are consistently directed toward the achievement of the program or purposes of authoritarianism, totalitarianism, terrorism and other forces that suppress individual liberties and freedom of association..." (Art. II, Sec. 7). Under Art. II, Sec. 4 and Sec. 8, the AFL–CIO has the authority to place conditions on the issuance of charters, and formally has endorsed the policy of merging small unions into larger ones. In 2001, the AFL–CIO formally established rules regarding the size, financial stability, governance structure, jurisdiction, and leadership stability of unions seeking affiliation. And although the AFL–CIO constitution permits the federation to charter Directly Affiliated Local Unions, the AFL–CIO has largely refused to charter such unions since the 1970s.
A list of current member unions may be found at List of unions affiliated with the AFL-CIO.

In recent years the AFL–CIO has concentrated its political efforts on lobbying in Washington and the state capitals, and on "GOTV" (get-out-the-vote) campaigns and in major elections. For example, in the 2010 midterm elections, it sent 28.6 million pieces of mail. Members will receive a "slate card" with a list of union endorsements matched to the member's Congressional district, along with a "personalized" letter from President Trumka emphasizing the importance of voting. In addition, 100,000 volunteers will be going door to door to promote endorsed candidates to 13 million union voters in 32 states .


Guild
A guild /ɡɪld/ is an association of artisans or merchants who control the practice of their craft in a particular town. The earliest types of guild were formed as confraternities of workers. They were organized in a manner something between a professional association, trade union, a cartel, and a secret society. They often depended on grants of letters patent by a monarch or other authority to enforce the flow of trade to their self-employed members, and to retain ownership of tools and the supply of materials. A lasting legacy of traditional guilds are the guildhalls constructed and used as meeting places.

One of the legacies of the guilds, the elevated Windsor Guildhall was originally a meeting place for guilds, as well as magistrates' seat and town hall.
An important result of the guild framework was the emergence of universities at Bologna, Paris, and Oxford around the year 1200; they originated as guilds of students as at Bologna, or of masters as at Paris.

Early guildlike associations
In medieval cities, craftsmen tended to form associations based on their trades, confraternities of textile workers, masons, carpenters, carvers, glass workers, each of whom controlled secrets of traditionally imparted technology, the "arts" or "mysteries" of their crafts. Usually the founders were free independent master craftsmen who hired apprentices

"wikipedia.com"



The American Federation of Labor, founded in 1886 and led by Samuel Gompers until his death in 1924, proved much more durable. It arose as a loose coalition of various local unions. It helped coordinate and support strikes and eventually became a major player in national politics, usually on the side of the Democrats.  

In a world where the normal work day was 10 to 12 hours long and unsafe working conditions, laboring workers found themselves up against new demands in the mechanized workplaces and factories.  People were no match for the machines which could run endlessly. People now had to keep up and work at the pace dictated by the machine.  Working conditions had to change and employers needed to understand the problems their newly created factories were causing at the beginning of the industrial age.

A scene from the epic 1936 film “Modern Times” by Charlie Chaplin;  depicts the problems and challenges faced by people in the mechanized work place.
http://www.npr.org/2010/12/02/131753139/must-see-movie-selections-for-the-giving-season

As the American Industrial Revolution continued to grow and dominate the US labor landscape the need for some kind of regulatory agency to guide the newly formed Industry’s and represent the working labors on many new issues from safety to labor guidelines of employment ages to eliminate child labor and fair wages only to name a few.  The early years of industrialization in the US saw a social upheaval in response to new problems not seen by society before.  Industrialization also spawned new opportunities for social advancement on a grand scale.  Since no such organization existed to meet the many and varied perplexities of Industrialization the Labor Union evolved in response to the needs of labor in the late nineteenth century.

American labor unions benefited greatly from the New Deal policies of Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the 1930s. The Wagner Act, in particular, legally protected the right of unions to organize. Unions from this point developed increasingly closer ties to the Democratic Party, and are considered a backbone element of the New Deal Coalition.



Mid 1930’s strike against General Motors.
http://tcsidewalks.blogspot.com/2010/09/strikes-and-sidewalks-and-jimmy-johns.html

In many ways labor unions are somewhat similar to the scaffolding needed for a building under construction.  They exist to aid in the building in its completion and are eventually removed when the building is completed.  The problem with Labor Unions is they never seem to declare their work as finished and over stay their welcome.  In fact these Unions have eventually killed the rank and file they once represented because the Corporations the Union bargained with were forced into bankruptcy or to relocate outside of the United States where it was possible for them to continue doing business.  This scenario has played out time and time again over the last half century.

One of the most notable examples of a Labor Union “self distructing” occurred in 1981 with the “Air Traffic Controllors” Union as this article from the "New York Times" recalls.


OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

The Strike That Busted Unions

By JOSEPH A. McCARTIN

Published: August 2, 2011

Ronald Reagan
Ron Edmonds, AP
THIRTY years ago today, when he threatened to fire nearly 13,000 air traffic controllers unless they called off an illegal strike, Ronald Reagan not only transformed his presidency, but also shaped the world of the modern workplace.
More than any other labor dispute of the past three decades, Reagan’s confrontation with the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization, or Patco, undermined the bargaining power of American workers and their labor unions. It also polarized our politics in ways that prevent us from addressing the root of our economic troubles: the continuing stagnation of incomes despite rising corporate profits and worker productivity.
By firing those who refused to heed his warning, and breaking their union, Reagan took a considerable risk. Even his closest advisers worried that a major air disaster might result from the wholesale replacement of striking controllers. Air travel was significantly curtailed, and it took several years and billions of dollars (much more than Patco had demanded) to return the system to its pre-strike levels.
But the risk paid off for Reagan in the short run. He showed federal workers and Soviet leaders alike how tough he could be. Although there were 39 illegal work stoppages against the federal government between 1962 and 1981, no significant federal job actions followed Reagan’s firing of the Patco strikers. His forceful handling of the walkout, meanwhile, impressed the Soviets, strengthening his hand in the talks he later pursued with Mikhail S. Gorbachev.
Yet three decades later, with the economy shrinking or stagnant for nearly four years now and Reagan’s party moving even further to the right than where he stood, the long-term costs of his destruction of the union loom ever larger. It is clear now that the fallout from the strike has hurt workers and distorted our politics in ways Reagan himself did not advocate.
Although a conservative, Reagan often argued that private sector workers’ rights to organize were fundamental in a democracy. He not only made this point when supporting Lech Walesa’s anti-Communist Solidarity movement in Poland; he also boasted of being the first president of the Screen Actors Guild to leadhttp://cdncache1-a.akamaihd.net/items/it/img/arrow-10x10.png that union in a strike. Over time, however, his crushing of the controllers’ walkout — which he believed was justified because federal workers were not allowed under the law to strike — has helped undermine the private-sector rights he once defended.
Workers in the private sector had used the strike as a tool of leverage in labor-management conflicts between World War II and 1981, repeatedly withholding their work to win fairer treatment from recalcitrant employers. But after Patco, that weapon was largely lost. Reagan’s unprecedented dismissal of skilled strikers encouraged private employers to do likewise. Phelps Dodge and International Paper were among the companies that imitated Reagan by replacing strikers rather than negotiating with them. Many other employers followed suit.
By 2010, the number of workers participating in walkouts was less than 2 percent of what it had been when Reagan led the actors’ strike in 1952. Lacking the leverage that strikes once provided, unions have been unable to pressure employers to increase wages as productivity rises. Inequality has ballooned to a level not seen since Reagan’s boyhood in the 1920s.
Although he opposed government strikes, Reagan supported government workers’ efforts to unionize and bargain collectively. As governor, he extended such rights in California. As president he was prepared to do the same. Not only did he court and win Patco’s endorsement during his 1980 campaign, he directed his negotiators to go beyond his legal authority to offer controllers a pay raise before their strike — the first time a president had ever offered so much to a federal employees’ union.
But the impact of the Patco strike on Reagan’s fellow Republicans has long since overshadowed his own professed beliefs regarding public sector unions. Over time the rightward-shifting Republican Party has come to view Reagan’s mass firings not as a focused effort to stop one union from breaking the law — as Reagan portrayed it — but rather as a blow against public sector unionism itself.
In the spring, Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin invoked Reagan’s handling of Patco as he prepared to “change history” by stripping public employees of collective bargaining rights in a party-line vote. “I’m not negotiating,” Mr. Walker said. By then the world had seemingly forgotten that unlike Mr. Walker, Reagan had not challenged public employees’ right to bargain — only their right to strike.
With Mr. Walker’s militant anti-union views now ascendant within the party of a onetime union leader, with workers less able to defend their interests in the workplace than at any time since the Depression, the long-term consequences continue to unfold in ways Reagan himself could not have predicted — producing outcomes for which he never advocated.
Joseph A. McCartin, an associate professor of history at Georgetown University, is the author of the forthcoming “Collision Course: Ronald Reagan, the Air Traffic Controllers, and the Strike That Changed America.”
A version of this op-ed appeared in print on August 3, 2011, on page A25 of the New York edition with the headline: The Strike That Busted Unions.

"The New York Times"

Today most Union Contracts specify how grievances are to be dealt with and call for a binding arbitrator when differences reach an impasse and are not able to be resolved.  Strikes are rarely called by unions these days and have proven to be a costly action for the rank and file of a Union. Union membership has declined from their hay day of the 1930's Thur the 1980's.  The charts from "wikipedia.com" below illustrate the declining popularity of Unions.


File:Union membership in us 1930-2010.png


File:Union Membership and Support.svg
Charts obtained from "wikipedia.com".



As the "Rust Belt" industries have closed or moved out of the country newer unions are now on the rise.  The problem with these unions is they do not have the economic infrastructure to support them which once existed.  Another weakness with these unions occurs because they are basically service oriented organizations which produce no product or income and are an expense to operate.  In short: they are now a huge burden to the economy.  AFSCME  is a Union who's membership is made up of Federal, State and Municipal Bureaucrats and is now ranked as the largest Union in the United States.  AFSCME seems to be a conflict of interests as they are a very large part of the organization which employs them. 

As the following "wikipedia" details AFSCME as a Union is directly involved with political campaigns.  Labor Unions have always supported the Democratic Party.  With a Union now directly working for the Government at all levels there is now a cause for concern not only for the wage and benefits which they are practically giving to themselves with our tax dollars but also for the political influence they are forcing upon the country as a whole.  It should be noted that Bureaucrats are usually around longer than the legislatures who were elected into office and are supposed to be employing the AFSCME membership.





http://council81.homestead.com/main.html




American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from AFSCME)

The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) is a major trade union in the United States. It represents approximately 1.5 million workers, most of whom work in the public sector. The union has become known in recent years for its involvement in political campaigns.
AFSCME is part of the AFL-CIO, one of the two main labor federations in the United States. Employees at the federal government level are primarily represented by other unions, such as the American Federation of Government Employees, with which AFSCME was once affiliated, and the National Treasury Employees Union; but AFSCME does represent some federal employees at the Federal Aviation Administration and the Library of Congress, among others.
According to their website, AFSCME organizes for social and economic rights of their protectorates in the workplace and through political action and legislative advocacy. It is divided into more than 3,500 local unions in 46 U.S. states, plus the District of Columbiaand Puerto Rico. Each local union writes its own constitution, holds membership meetings, and elects its own officers. Councils are also a part of AFSCME's administrative structure, usually grouping together various locals in a geographic area.

AFSCME members with then-Senator Barack Obama, 2008


"Wikipedia.com"



With the recent Government shut down in Washington DC and Government deficits at every level of State and Municipal Governments one of the biggest expenditures for Government salaries is the benefits and pensions being given to AFSCME bureaucrats.  Their Union slogan, "We Make It Happen", is a little ironic when we think about Government deficit spending and shut downs!  Oh; and one other thing about this union - AFSCME has no redeeming social qualities such as safety or working conditions.  They are motivated by greed!



It’s certainly not unusual for conflicts between business and labor to be played out in the Capitol.
It is, however, very unusual for conflicts between two labor unions to reach the Capitol. And one such duel now presents Gov. Jerry Brown with a dilemma.


Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/10/08/5805669/dan-walters-california-labor-union.html#storylink=cpy  http://www.sacbee.com/2013/10/08/5805669/dan-walters-california-labor-union.html
http://www.capoliticalreview.com/trending/ca-labor-union-feud-lands-on-browns-desk/


THE CONTINUING UNPOPULARITY OF LABOR UNIONS








 3 Sep 2012

In honor of the Labor Day holiday, Gallup is out with its regular survey assessing the public's attitude about labor unions. Gallup's headline is that approval of labor unions is steady at 52%. This is true, if by steady you mean that unions continue to have the lowest approval rating since the question was first asked in the 1930s. 

Just four years ago, 60% of the public approved of labor unions, while 31% disapproved. Today, 42% disapprove of unions, a move of 11 points in a very short period of time. In the 70+ years Gallup has been asking the question, approval has generally been in the 60s and disapproval in the 20s. Support for unions peaked in the 1950s, when 75% of the public approved of unions. 
And, this isn't some kind of skew from question wording. Here's the question Gallup asks:
Do you approve or disapprove of labor unions?
Now, I do have certain existential problems with unions, but I'm not certain I would disapprove of them 100% of the time in all situations. I mean, that question is a pretty clear up-or-down choice. That only around half of adults approve of unions today is a stark reminder of how far labor unions have fallen. 
Worse for unions, however, is that a plurality of Americans, 41%, think unions should have less influence. 25% think they should have about the same amount of influence and 29% think unions should have more influence. Four years ago, these numbers were basically reversed, with 35% wanting unions to have more influence and 32% less influence. 
I think two things account for labor's approval drop; the recession and the growing fight over public sector wages and benefits. At their most basic level, unions are a job cartel making union membership a requirement for many jobs in large parts of the country. With so many Americans unable to find work for the past four years, there is bound to be growing resentment towards unions. 
But, the second reason should worry union bosses. A majority of union members now are public sector employees. As state and local governments struggle with very tight budgets, the wages and benefits of public sector employees are becoming enormous issues in the debate over government spending. It will be next to impossible to get spending under control unless the expensive benefit packages are curtailed.
To many Americans, though, it isn't so much a math problem as a question of fairness. In most cases, public sector union members pay very little for health and pension benefits that a private sector worker could only dream about. These benefits are paid for with taxes from the private sector worker, who herself often has to struggle to afford health insurance and save for retirement. 
The whole situation is unsustainable and, until it is addressed, expect public support for labor unions continue to decline. 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/03/the-continuing-unpopularity-of-labor-unions



In private sector labor disputes, unions and management both have ample incentives to protect their respective interests.
With government labor negotiations, by contrast, that natural system of checks and balances doesn’t exist. There’s no strong incentive for politicians to be frugal stewards of taxpayer money – particularly when they negotiate very expensive fringe benefits that defer costs to future years.
Indeed, because government employee unions tend to be very politically active, often being huge contributors to political campaigns, politicians often have a strong incentive to be profligate with taxpayer money.
http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/this-cartoon-summarizes-the-corrupt-insider-dealing-that-governor-walker-and-others-are-trying-to-fix/


This has been Felicity looking at some of the not so well known facts about some Labor Unions for the "Noodleman Group".  See you next week!




 
Tell your friends and associates about us! 
It's easy!  Just copy and paste me into your email!



* “The Noodleman Group” is pleased to announce that we are now carrying a link to the “USA Today” news site.We installed the “widget/gadget” August 20, and it will be carried as a regular feature on our site.Now you can read“Noodleman” and then check in to “USA Today” for all the up to date News, Weather, Sports and more!Just scroll all the way down to the bottom of our site and hit the “USA Today” hyperlinks.Enjoy!